???, 10. ?? 2006
德國網路刊物: Perlentaucher.de與Sign and Sight(一)
taipeher1, 00:09h
Perlentaucher.de(採珠人)是一個純網路的文化性雜誌(Kulturmagazin),它自稱是德語圈中最多人閱讀的網路文化雜誌,每月有五十萬人次的讀者造訪.其主要內容是提供所謂Feuilletonrundschau.
所謂Feuilleton是刊在報紙副刊的小品欄,裡面的內容可能是隨筆(Essay),報導(Bericht),時評(Kommentar)或書評(Kritik),傳統上Feuilleton內容多與文化藝術相關,但也越來越多書寫流行文化,政經,甚至科技.Feuilletonrundschau就是對報章上Feuilleton的評論,這些Feuilleton都來自德語區的一些較有聲望的"質報"(Qualitätszeitungen),採珠人雜誌的文章內容就是"針對本主題,xx報的xx作家寫了些什麼,yy報的記者又寫了什麼...",每日早上九點,採珠人的編輯會寫出一篇"Heute in den Feuilletons"(今天在Feuilleton上)放上網站.這背後的Idee有點像是"今日各大報頭條",但是細緻多了,添加了觀點的整理和評論,而不只是單純列出來而已.
Perlentaucher.de旗下有另一個網站叫Sign and Sight,它是Perlentaucher的英文版,這個網站旨在提供讀者"Arts, Essays, Ideas from Germany".
所謂Feuilleton是刊在報紙副刊的小品欄,裡面的內容可能是隨筆(Essay),報導(Bericht),時評(Kommentar)或書評(Kritik),傳統上Feuilleton內容多與文化藝術相關,但也越來越多書寫流行文化,政經,甚至科技.Feuilletonrundschau就是對報章上Feuilleton的評論,這些Feuilleton都來自德語區的一些較有聲望的"質報"(Qualitätszeitungen),採珠人雜誌的文章內容就是"針對本主題,xx報的xx作家寫了些什麼,yy報的記者又寫了什麼...",每日早上九點,採珠人的編輯會寫出一篇"Heute in den Feuilletons"(今天在Feuilleton上)放上網站.這背後的Idee有點像是"今日各大報頭條",但是細緻多了,添加了觀點的整理和評論,而不只是單純列出來而已.
Perlentaucher.de旗下有另一個網站叫Sign and Sight,它是Perlentaucher的英文版,這個網站旨在提供讀者"Arts, Essays, Ideas from Germany".
... link (0 Kommentare) ... comment
???, 4. ?? 2006
Towards a United States of Europe
taipeher1, 03:51h
by Jürgen Habermas
Why should we get excited about such a lacklustre topic as the future of Europe? My answer is: if we are not able to hold a Europe-wide referendum before the next European elections in 2009 on the shape Europe should take, the future of the Union will be decided in favour of neo-liberal orthodoxy. Avoiding this touchy issue for the sake of a convenient peace and muddling along the well-trodden path of compromise will give free reign to the dynamic of unbridled market forces. This would force us to watch as the European Union's current political power is dismantled in favour of a diffuse European free-trade zone. For the first time in the process of European unification, we face the danger of regressing to a level of integration below what has already been achieved. What irks me is the paralytic numbness that has set in after the failure of the constitutional referenda in France and the Netherlands. Not taking a decision in this context amounts to a decision with major consequences.
Three pressing problems are bundled together in the single issue of Europe's inability to act:
(1) The international economic situation has changed in the wake of globalisation. Today's conditions deprive the national state of the tax resources it needs to satisfy its population's demands for collective goods and public services, or even to maintain the status quo. Further challenges, such as demographic developments and increased immigration, only aggravate the situation. Here the only defence is offence: winning back political clout on a supra-national level. Without convergent tax rates and medium-term harmonisation of economic and social-policies, we are in effect relinquishing our hold over the European social model.
(2) The return to ruthless hegemonic power politics, the clash of the West and the Islamic world, the decay of state structures in other parts of the world, the long-term social consequences of colonialism and the immediate political consequences of failed de-colonisation – all of this points to a high-risk international situation. Only a European Union capable of acting on the world stage - and taking its place beside the USA, China, India and Japan - can press for an alternative to the ruling Washington consensus in the world's economic institutions. Only such a Europe can advance the long overdue reforms within the UN which are both blocked by and dependent on the USA.
(3) One cause for the rift in the West that has become apparent since the Iraq war is the clash of cultures that now divides America itself into two camps of almost equal size. This clash has also caused a shift in the hitherto valid normative standards of government policy. America's closest allies cannot remain indifferent here. It is precisely in critical cases of joint action that we must break free of our dependence on our superior partner. That is one more reason why the European Union needs its own armed forces. Until now Europeans have been subordinated to the dictates and regulations of the American high command in NATO deployments. The time has come for us to attain a position where even in a joint military deployment we still remain true to our own conceptions of human rights, the ban on torture and wartime criminal law.
For these reasons, I believe Europe must pluck up the courage to introduce reforms which will give it not only effective decision-making procedures, but also its own foreign minister, a directly-elected president and its own financial basis. These could be the subject of a referendum held concurrently with the next European parliamentary elections. The draft would be considered passed if it received the 'double majority' of votes of the states and the electorate. At the same time, the referendum would only bind the member states in which a majority had voted in favour. Europe would then move away from the convoy model where the tempo is set by the slowest member. Even in a Europe made up of core and periphery, countries preferring to remain on the periphery retain the option of rejoining the core at any time.
Why should we get excited about such a lacklustre topic as the future of Europe? My answer is: if we are not able to hold a Europe-wide referendum before the next European elections in 2009 on the shape Europe should take, the future of the Union will be decided in favour of neo-liberal orthodoxy. Avoiding this touchy issue for the sake of a convenient peace and muddling along the well-trodden path of compromise will give free reign to the dynamic of unbridled market forces. This would force us to watch as the European Union's current political power is dismantled in favour of a diffuse European free-trade zone. For the first time in the process of European unification, we face the danger of regressing to a level of integration below what has already been achieved. What irks me is the paralytic numbness that has set in after the failure of the constitutional referenda in France and the Netherlands. Not taking a decision in this context amounts to a decision with major consequences.
Three pressing problems are bundled together in the single issue of Europe's inability to act:
(1) The international economic situation has changed in the wake of globalisation. Today's conditions deprive the national state of the tax resources it needs to satisfy its population's demands for collective goods and public services, or even to maintain the status quo. Further challenges, such as demographic developments and increased immigration, only aggravate the situation. Here the only defence is offence: winning back political clout on a supra-national level. Without convergent tax rates and medium-term harmonisation of economic and social-policies, we are in effect relinquishing our hold over the European social model.
(2) The return to ruthless hegemonic power politics, the clash of the West and the Islamic world, the decay of state structures in other parts of the world, the long-term social consequences of colonialism and the immediate political consequences of failed de-colonisation – all of this points to a high-risk international situation. Only a European Union capable of acting on the world stage - and taking its place beside the USA, China, India and Japan - can press for an alternative to the ruling Washington consensus in the world's economic institutions. Only such a Europe can advance the long overdue reforms within the UN which are both blocked by and dependent on the USA.
(3) One cause for the rift in the West that has become apparent since the Iraq war is the clash of cultures that now divides America itself into two camps of almost equal size. This clash has also caused a shift in the hitherto valid normative standards of government policy. America's closest allies cannot remain indifferent here. It is precisely in critical cases of joint action that we must break free of our dependence on our superior partner. That is one more reason why the European Union needs its own armed forces. Until now Europeans have been subordinated to the dictates and regulations of the American high command in NATO deployments. The time has come for us to attain a position where even in a joint military deployment we still remain true to our own conceptions of human rights, the ban on torture and wartime criminal law.
For these reasons, I believe Europe must pluck up the courage to introduce reforms which will give it not only effective decision-making procedures, but also its own foreign minister, a directly-elected president and its own financial basis. These could be the subject of a referendum held concurrently with the next European parliamentary elections. The draft would be considered passed if it received the 'double majority' of votes of the states and the electorate. At the same time, the referendum would only bind the member states in which a majority had voted in favour. Europe would then move away from the convoy model where the tempo is set by the slowest member. Even in a Europe made up of core and periphery, countries preferring to remain on the periphery retain the option of rejoining the core at any time.
... link (0 Kommentare) ... comment
